What was Nicolás Otamendi worth?Value by season, 2009–2018
Nicolás Otamendi (CB, Argentina) is on file for 8 seasons, from 2010–11 at FC Porto to 2017–18 at Manchester City. His value peaked at £26.3M in 2017–18 — £47.9M in today’s transfer money.
Fees in today's money (transfer inflation). Wages over a three-season deal. Extras are entirely fictional — we checked.
Season by season
| Season | Club | Age | Rating | Value then | Fee today |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 | FC Porto | 22 | 76 | £4.3M | £19.0M |
| 2011-12 | FC Porto | 23 | 80 | £6.1M | £25.4M |
| 2012-13 | FC Porto | 24 | 82 | £7.7M | £30.0M |
| 2013-14 | FC Porto | 25 | 81 | £11.0M | £38.6M |
| 2014-15 | Valencia CF | 26 | 83 | £9.7M | £30.3M |
| 2015-16 | Manchester City | 27 | 80 | £18.1M | £47.1M |
| 2016-17 | Manchester City | 28 | 82 | £26.2M | £56.2M |
| 2017-18 | Manchester City | 29 | 84★ | £26.3M | £47.9M |
Rating: that season (Hardcore); ★ = his peak, what he plays at in Classic if signed that season (one point less per season away, never below that season's rating). Value then: market value at the time (nominal £). Fee today: adjusted for transfer-market inflation.
Eleven signings from 2009–18 at what they cost then, in today's money. Nine Premier League champions to beat.
Teammates in 2017–18
The most valuable players alongside him at Manchester City in 2017-18.
| Player | Pos | Age | Rtg | Value then | Fee today |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kevin De BruyneCAM · 26 | CAM | 26 | 91 | £57.0M | £103.7M |
| Sergio AgüeroST · 29 | ST | 29 | 88 | £57.0M | £103.7M |
| Raheem SterlingRW · 23 | RW | 23 | 86 | £39.5M | £71.9M |
| Bernardo SilvaRW · 23 | RW | 23 | 84 | £35.1M | £63.9M |
| Leroy SanéLW · 21 | LW | 21 | 86 | £30.7M | £55.9M |
| John StonesCB · 23 | CB | 23 | 79 | £30.7M | £55.9M |
| David SilvaCAM · 31 | CAM | 31 | 89 | £26.3M | £47.9M |
| Kyle WalkerRB · 27 | RB | 27 | 85 | £26.3M | £47.9M |
Questions on file
Q.How much was Nicolás Otamendi worth in 2010-11?
In 2010–11, Nicolás Otamendi was valued at £4.3m at FC Porto, aged 22. Adjusted for transfer-market inflation, that's a £19m fee in today's money.
Q.How much was Nicolás Otamendi worth in 2011-12?
In 2011–12, Nicolás Otamendi was valued at £6.1m at FC Porto, aged 23. Adjusted for transfer-market inflation, that's a £25.4m fee in today's money.
Q.How much was Nicolás Otamendi worth in 2012-13?
In 2012–13, Nicolás Otamendi was valued at £7.7m at FC Porto, aged 24. Adjusted for transfer-market inflation, that's a £30m fee in today's money.
Q.How much was Nicolás Otamendi worth in 2013-14?
In 2013–14, Nicolás Otamendi was valued at £11m at FC Porto, aged 25. Adjusted for transfer-market inflation, that's a £38.6m fee in today's money.
Q.How much was Nicolás Otamendi worth in 2014-15?
In 2014–15, Nicolás Otamendi was valued at £9.7m at Valencia CF, aged 26. Adjusted for transfer-market inflation, that's a £30.3m fee in today's money.
Q.How much was Nicolás Otamendi worth in 2015-16?
In 2015–16, Nicolás Otamendi was valued at £18.1m at Manchester City, aged 27. Adjusted for transfer-market inflation, that's a £47.1m fee in today's money.
Q.How much was Nicolás Otamendi worth in 2016-17?
In 2016–17, Nicolás Otamendi was valued at £26.2m at Manchester City, aged 28. Adjusted for transfer-market inflation, that's a £56.2m fee in today's money.
Q.How much was Nicolás Otamendi worth in 2017-18?
In 2017–18, Nicolás Otamendi was valued at £26.3m at Manchester City, aged 29. Adjusted for transfer-market inflation, that's a £47.9m fee in today's money.
Q.When was Nicolás Otamendi worth the most?
Between 2009-10 and 2017-18, Nicolás Otamendi's highest value was £26.3m in 2017–18, at Manchester City.
Q.What is Nicolás Otamendi's rating in 9-0-0?
In Classic, Nicolás Otamendi plays at his peak rating of 84 if you sign him in his best season (2017-18), one point less for each season away from it, never below that season's rating (2010-11: 77, 2011-12: 80, 2012-13: 82, 2013-14: 81, 2014-15: 83, 2015-16: 82, 2016-17: 83, 2017-18: 84). In Hardcore he plays at the rating of the season you sign him (2010-11: 76, 2011-12: 80, 2012-13: 82, 2013-14: 81, 2014-15: 83, 2015-16: 80, 2016-17: 82, 2017-18: 84).